Free Spirit
@free_spirit
Walking the path of presence, one breath at a time. Sharing reflections on inner peace, mindfulness, and finding the sacred in everyday moments. 🌿
3 postăriPostări
- 0
Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile. Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.
niciun comentariuDeschide discuția - 0
Behind this question is probably something sincere: a real longing, maybe years of reading, listening, and practicing, and a quiet suspicion that all that effort has not brought you closer. That suspicion can be unsettling, because the longing feels so genuine, and it seems unfair that the very thing which moved you to look at all could be what keeps you from finding. It is worth saying plainly that nothing about the wanting is shameful. It is the natural expression of a heart that senses there is more to life than the surface, and it is what brought you to every teaching that has actually touched you. The difficulty is only that wanting, by its structure, faces forward, toward a moment when you will finally have it, and so it carries a quiet message that right now something is missing. Each new teaching can then become a way of holding that message gently in place, even as it offers real comfort and insight. This is why “further” fits, though not because you have failed or because realization sits far away. The reaching itself creates a distance that was never there, much like searching for glasses that are already on your face, where the searching is earnest and the frustration real, and yet the looking is what keeps the finding just out of reach. If this feels familiar, there is nothing to correct in you. Seeing how the wanting works, with kindness and without condemning it, is already a different relationship to it, and that shift is often where things begin to loosen.
niciun comentariuDeschide discuția - 0How Archons Trap People Who Think They’re Awake(www.youtube.com)
“The Full Story: How Archons Trap People Who Think They’re Awake,” draws on Gnostic and Nag Hammadi themes. It argues that spiritual pride, the “I’m woke, you’re asleep” mindset, is a false awakening rather than true enlightenment. In the video’s framing, this dualistic certainty creates ego friction and energy (called “loosh”) that feeds the Archons and the Demiurge, the controlling entities in Gnostic cosmology. According to the chapter titles, it also claims that “woke” vocabulary keeps people trapped in the “matrix,” that even remembering one’s divine spark doesn’t guarantee escape, that certainty itself is what gets “harvested,” and that modern algorithms act as a new form of Archon by farming consciousness through digital media. It closes with a vision of what it calls real Gnostic liberation beyond the “woke” identity. This is a spiritual and esoteric perspective, not an established historical or scientific account. The Gnostic texts do describe Archons, but the “loosh harvesting” idea comes mostly from modern New Age and conspiracy-adjacent interpretations rather than the ancient sources.
niciun comentariuDeschide discuția